>>> Building on exopi-4 under security/nfsshell DIST = [security/nfsshell:nfsshell.tar.gz] FULLPKGNAME = nfsshell-1.0p2 Woken up telephony/p5-asterisk Woken up fonts/zh-wqy-zenhei-ttf Woken up textproc/p5-Sourcecode-Spellchecker Woken up textproc/p5-Sourcecode-Spellchecker Woken up comms/spisniffer (Junk lock failure for exopi-4 at 1764528196.96018) Received IO (Junk lock obtained for exopi-4 at 1764528245.46) Received IO Still tainted: host marked nojunk by x11/qt6/qtwebengine >>> Running junk in security/nfsshell at 1764528247.31 Can't run junk because of lock on x11/qt6/qtwebengine (Junk lock released for exopi-4 at 1764528249.21) Woken up misc/migrationtools distfiles size=29213 >>> Running build in security/nfsshell at 1764528249.24 ===> security/nfsshell ===> Building from scratch nfsshell-1.0p2 ===> Verifying specs: c curses readline ===> found c.102.2 curses.16.0 readline.6.0 ===> Checking files for nfsshell-1.0p2 `/exopi-cvs/ports/distfiles/nfsshell.tar.gz' is up to date. >> (SHA256) all files: OK ===> Extracting for nfsshell-1.0p2 ===> Patching for nfsshell-1.0p2 ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-Makefile Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- Makefile.orig Tue May 19 22:37:23 1998 |+++ Makefile Fri Oct 31 18:46:12 2008 -------------------------- Patching file Makefile using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-nfs_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- nfs.c.orig Tue May 19 14:36:10 1998 |+++ nfs.c Sun Mar 18 10:49:08 2012 -------------------------- Patching file nfs.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 40. Hunk #2 succeeded at 49. Hunk #3 succeeded at 56. Hunk #4 succeeded at 166. Hunk #5 succeeded at 185. Hunk #6 succeeded at 262. Hunk #7 succeeded at 373. Hunk #8 succeeded at 390. Hunk #9 succeeded at 443. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-nfs_prot_xdr_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- nfs_prot_xdr.c.orig Tue May 19 16:55:27 1998 |+++ nfs_prot_xdr.c Fri Oct 26 23:32:30 2007 -------------------------- Patching file nfs_prot_xdr.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 62. Hunk #2 succeeded at 107. Hunk #3 succeeded at 516. Hunk #4 succeeded at 537. done ===> Compiler link: clang -> /usr/bin/clang ===> Compiler link: clang++ -> /usr/bin/clang++ ===> Compiler link: cc -> /usr/bin/cc ===> Compiler link: c++ -> /usr/bin/c++ ===> Generating configure for nfsshell-1.0p2 ===> Configuring for nfsshell-1.0p2 ===> Building for nfsshell-1.0p2 cc -O2 -pipe -DREADLINE -c mount_clnt.c cc -O2 -pipe -DREADLINE -c mount_xdr.c cc -O2 -pipe -DREADLINE -c nfs_prot_clnt.c cc -O2 -pipe -DREADLINE -c nfs_prot_xdr.c nfs_prot_xdr.c:236:10: warning: 17 enumeration values not handled in switch: 'NFSERR_PERM', 'NFSERR_NOENT', 'NFSERR_IO'... [-Wswitch] 236 | switch (objp->status) { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ nfs_prot_xdr.c:292:10: warning: 17 enumeration values not handled in switch: 'NFSERR_PERM', 'NFSERR_NOENT', 'NFSERR_IO'... [-Wswitch] 292 | switch (objp->status) { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ nfs_prot_xdr.c:309:10: warning: 17 enumeration values not handled in switch: 'NFSERR_PERM', 'NFSERR_NOENT', 'NFSERR_IO'... [-Wswitch] 309 | switch (objp->status) { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ nfs_prot_xdr.c:356:10: warning: 17 enumeration values not handled in switch: 'NFSERR_PERM', 'NFSERR_NOENT', 'NFSERR_IO'... [-Wswitch] 356 | switch (objp->status) { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ nfs_prot_xdr.c:502:10: warning: 17 enumeration values not handled in switch: 'NFSERR_PERM', 'NFSERR_NOENT', 'NFSERR_IO'... [-Wswitch] 502 | switch (objp->status) { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ nfs_prot_xdr.c:583:10: warning: 17 enumeration values not handled in switch: 'NFSERR_PERM', 'NFSERR_NOENT', 'NFSERR_IO'... [-Wswitch] 583 | switch (objp->status) { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ 6 warnings generated. cc -O2 -pipe -DREADLINE -c nfs.c nfs.c:386:2: warning: call to undeclared function 'add_history'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 386 | add_history(line); | ^ nfs.c:2019:9: warning: a function declaration without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C and is treated as a zero-parameter prototype in C23, conflicting with a subsequent definition [-Wdeprecated-non-prototype] 2019 | int dircmp(); | ^ nfs.c:2071:1: note: conflicting prototype is here 2071 | dircmp(char **p, char **q) | ^ 2 warnings generated. cc -g -o nfs mount_clnt.o mount_xdr.o nfs_prot_clnt.o nfs_prot_xdr.o nfs.o -lreadline -ltermcap >>> Running package in security/nfsshell at 1764528250.74 ===> security/nfsshell ===> Faking installation for nfsshell-1.0p2 /exopi-obj/pobj/nfsshell-1.0/bin/install -c -s -m 755 /exopi-obj/pobj/nfsshell-1.0/nfs/nfs /exopi-obj/pobj/nfsshell-1.0/fake-amd64/usr/local/bin/nfsshell ===> Building package for nfsshell-1.0p2 Create /exopi-cvs/ports/packages/amd64/all/nfsshell-1.0p2.tgz Creating package nfsshell-1.0p2 reading plist| checking dependencies| checksumming| checksumming| | 0% checksumming|****** | 9% checksumming|*********** | 18% checksumming|***************** | 27% checksumming|********************** | 36% checksumming|**************************** | 45% checksumming|********************************* | 55% checksumming|*************************************** | 64% checksumming|******************************************** | 73% checksumming|************************************************** | 82% checksumming|******************************************************* | 91% checksumming|*************************************************************|100% archiving| archiving| | 0% archiving| | 1% archiving|****************************************************************|100% Link to /exopi-cvs/ports/packages/amd64/ftp/nfsshell-1.0p2.tgz >>> Running clean in security/nfsshell at 1764528251.63 ===> security/nfsshell ===> Cleaning for nfsshell-1.0p2 >>> Ended at 1764528251.78 max_stuck=19.08/waiting-for-lock #399=50.35/junk=1.93/build=1.49/package=0.89/clean=0.18