>>> Building on exopi-6 under devel/dwz DIST = [devel/dwz:xxhash-0.8.3.h;devel/dwz:dwz-0.16.tar.gz] FULLPKGNAME = dwz-0.16 distfiles size=456957 >>> Running build in devel/dwz at 1764442967.76 ===> devel/dwz ===> Building from scratch dwz-0.16 ===> Verifying specs: c elf ===> found c.102.2 elf.3.0 ===> Checking files for dwz-0.16 `/exopi-cvs/ports/distfiles/xxhash-0.8.3.h' is up to date. `/exopi-cvs/ports/distfiles/dwz-0.16.tar.gz' is up to date. >> (SHA256) all files: OK ===> Extracting for dwz-0.16 cp /exopi-cvs/ports/distfiles/xxhash-0.8.3.h /exopi-obj/pobj/dwz-0.16/dwz/xxhash.h ===> Patching for dwz-0.16 ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-Makefile Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Don't hardcode optimizations, install to the correct locations. |Disable warnings; clang is very chatty. |Put in obstack code. |Convert to bsd make | |Index: Makefile |--- Makefile.orig |+++ Makefile -------------------------- Patching file Makefile using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hunk #2 succeeded at 23. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-args_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Correctly get processors online. | |Index: args.c |--- args.c.orig |+++ args.c -------------------------- Patching file args.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 26. Hunk #2 succeeded at 738. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-dwz_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Create error() function, Linux-ism. |Our libelf doesn't have some of these defines. |obstack is not a system header |xxhash is not a system header | |Index: dwz.c |--- dwz.c.orig |+++ dwz.c -------------------------- Patching file dwz.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. Hunk #2 succeeded at 38. Hunk #3 succeeded at 213. Hunk #4 succeeded at 13800. Hunk #5 succeeded at 13838. Hunk #6 succeeded at 14335. Hunk #7 succeeded at 14408. Hunk #8 succeeded at 16027. Hunk #9 succeeded at 16120. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-hashtab_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |More portable endianness check |https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=162#c665 | |Index: hashtab.c |--- hashtab.c.orig |+++ hashtab.c -------------------------- Patching file hashtab.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 38. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-obstack-wrapper_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Fix include invocation | |Index: obstack-wrapper.h |--- obstack-wrapper.h.orig |+++ obstack-wrapper.h -------------------------- Patching file obstack-wrapper.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-obstack_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |From https://github.com/void-linux/musl-obstack | |Index: obstack.c |--- obstack.c.orig |+++ obstack.c -------------------------- (Creating file obstack.c...) Patching file obstack.c using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-obstack_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |From https://github.com/void-linux/musl-obstack | |Index: obstack.h |--- obstack.h.orig |+++ obstack.h -------------------------- (Creating file obstack.h...) Patching file obstack.h using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-sha1_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |More portable endianness check |https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=162#c665 | |Index: sha1.c |--- sha1.c.orig |+++ sha1.c -------------------------- Patching file sha1.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 29. done ===> Compiler link: clang -> /usr/bin/clang ===> Compiler link: clang++ -> /usr/bin/clang++ ===> Compiler link: cc -> /usr/bin/cc ===> Compiler link: c++ -> /usr/bin/c++ ===> Generating configure for dwz-0.16 ===> Configuring for dwz-0.16 ===> Building for dwz-0.16 cc -O2 -pipe -g -DNATIVE_POINTER_SIZE=8 -DNATIVE_ENDIAN_VAL=ELFDATA2LSB -DDWZ_VERSION='"0.16"' -DFSF_YEARS='"1992-2021"' -DRH_YEARS='"2001-2021"' -DSUSE_YEARS='"2019-2021"' -DMJW_YEARS='"2024-2025"' -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DXXH_INLINE_ALL=1 -c args.c cc -O2 -pipe -g -DNATIVE_POINTER_SIZE=8 -DNATIVE_ENDIAN_VAL=ELFDATA2LSB -DDWZ_VERSION='"0.16"' -DFSF_YEARS='"1992-2021"' -DRH_YEARS='"2001-2021"' -DSUSE_YEARS='"2019-2021"' -DMJW_YEARS='"2024-2025"' -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DXXH_INLINE_ALL=1 -c dwz.c cc -O2 -pipe -g -DNATIVE_POINTER_SIZE=8 -DNATIVE_ENDIAN_VAL=ELFDATA2LSB -DDWZ_VERSION='"0.16"' -DFSF_YEARS='"1992-2021"' -DRH_YEARS='"2001-2021"' -DSUSE_YEARS='"2019-2021"' -DMJW_YEARS='"2024-2025"' -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DXXH_INLINE_ALL=1 -c hashtab.c hashtab.c:69:1: warning: a function definition without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C and is not supported in C23 [-Wdeprecated-non-prototype] 69 | higher_prime_number (n) | ^ hashtab.c:133:1: warning: a function definition without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C and is not supported in C23 [-Wdeprecated-non-prototype] 133 | hash_pointer (p) | ^ hashtab.c:142:1: warning: a function definition without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C and is not supported in C23 [-Wdeprecated-non-prototype] 142 | eq_pointer (p1, p2) | ^ hashtab.c:155:1: warning: a function definition without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C and is not supported in C23 [-Wdeprecated-non-prototype] 155 | htab_try_create (size, hash_f, eq_f, del_f) | ^ hashtab.c:187:1: warning: a function definition without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C and is not supported in C23 [-Wdeprecated-non-prototype] 187 | htab_delete (htab) | ^ hashtab.c:205:1: warning: a function definition without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C and is not supported in C23 [-Wdeprecated-non-prototype] 205 | htab_empty (htab) | ^ hashtab.c:229:1: warning: a function definition without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C and is not supported in C23 [-Wdeprecated-non-prototype] 229 | find_empty_slot_for_expand (htab, hash) | ^ hashtab.c:267:1: warning: a function definition without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C and is not supported in C23 [-Wdeprecated-non-prototype] 267 | htab_expand (htab) | ^ hashtab.c:314:1: warning: a function definition without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C and is not supported in C23 [-Wdeprecated-non-prototype] 314 | htab_find_with_hash (htab, element, hash) | ^ hashtab.c:353:1: warning: a function definition without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C and is not supported in C23 [-Wdeprecated-non-prototype] 353 | htab_find (htab, element) | ^ hashtab.c:369:1: warning: a function definition without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C and is not supported in C23 [-Wdeprecated-non-prototype] 369 | htab_find_slot_with_hash (htab, element, hash, insert) | ^ hashtab.c:438:1: warning: a function definition without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C and is not supported in C23 [-Wdeprecated-non-prototype] 438 | htab_find_slot (htab, element, insert) | ^ hashtab.c:452:1: warning: a function definition without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C and is not supported in C23 [-Wdeprecated-non-prototype] 452 | htab_remove_elt (htab, element) | ^ hashtab.c:474:1: warning: a function definition without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C and is not supported in C23 [-Wdeprecated-non-prototype] 474 | htab_clear_slot (htab, slot) | ^ hashtab.c:495:1: warning: a function definition without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C and is not supported in C23 [-Wdeprecated-non-prototype] 495 | htab_traverse (htab, callback, info) | ^ hashtab.c:517:1: warning: a function definition without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C and is not supported in C23 [-Wdeprecated-non-prototype] 517 | htab_size (htab) | ^ hashtab.c:526:1: warning: a function definition without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C and is not supported in C23 [-Wdeprecated-non-prototype] 526 | htab_elements (htab) | ^ hashtab.c:536:1: warning: a function definition without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C and is not supported in C23 [-Wdeprecated-non-prototype] 536 | htab_collisions (htab) | ^ hashtab.c:547:1: warning: a function definition without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C and is not supported in C23 [-Wdeprecated-non-prototype] 547 | htab_dump (htab, name, dumpfn) | ^ hashtab.c:582:1: warning: a function definition without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C and is not supported in C23 [-Wdeprecated-non-prototype] 582 | htab_restore (htab, name, restorefn) | ^ 20 warnings generated. cc -O2 -pipe -g -DNATIVE_POINTER_SIZE=8 -DNATIVE_ENDIAN_VAL=ELFDATA2LSB -DDWZ_VERSION='"0.16"' -DFSF_YEARS='"1992-2021"' -DRH_YEARS='"2001-2021"' -DSUSE_YEARS='"2019-2021"' -DMJW_YEARS='"2024-2025"' -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DXXH_INLINE_ALL=1 -c pool.c cc -O2 -pipe -g -DNATIVE_POINTER_SIZE=8 -DNATIVE_ENDIAN_VAL=ELFDATA2LSB -DDWZ_VERSION='"0.16"' -DFSF_YEARS='"1992-2021"' -DRH_YEARS='"2001-2021"' -DSUSE_YEARS='"2019-2021"' -DMJW_YEARS='"2024-2025"' -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DXXH_INLINE_ALL=1 -c sha1.c cc -O2 -pipe -g -DNATIVE_POINTER_SIZE=8 -DNATIVE_ENDIAN_VAL=ELFDATA2LSB -DDWZ_VERSION='"0.16"' -DFSF_YEARS='"1992-2021"' -DRH_YEARS='"2001-2021"' -DSUSE_YEARS='"2019-2021"' -DMJW_YEARS='"2024-2025"' -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DXXH_INLINE_ALL=1 -c dwarfnames.c cc -O2 -pipe -g -DNATIVE_POINTER_SIZE=8 -DNATIVE_ENDIAN_VAL=ELFDATA2LSB -DDWZ_VERSION='"0.16"' -DFSF_YEARS='"1992-2021"' -DRH_YEARS='"2001-2021"' -DSUSE_YEARS='"2019-2021"' -DMJW_YEARS='"2024-2025"' -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DXXH_INLINE_ALL=1 -c obstack.c cc -o dwz args.o dwz.o hashtab.o pool.o sha1.o dwarfnames.o obstack.o -lelf ld: warning: dwz.c:13855(dwz.o:(fdopen_dso)): warning: strcpy() is almost always misused, please use strlcpy() ld: warning: dwz.c:731(dwz.o:(read_debug_info)): warning: sprintf() is often misused, please use snprintf() >>> Running package in devel/dwz at 1764442976.69 ===> devel/dwz ===> Faking installation for dwz-0.16 install -D dwz /exopi-obj/pobj/dwz-0.16/fake-amd64/usr/local/bin/dwz install -D -m 644 ./dwz.1 /exopi-obj/pobj/dwz-0.16/fake-amd64/usr/local/man/man1/dwz.1 Reading existing plist for dwz-0.16 Writing /exopi-obj/pobj/dwz-0.16/fake-amd64/debug-pkg/Makefile.new Writing /exopi-obj/pobj/dwz-0.16/fake-amd64/debug-pkg/PLIST Renaming /exopi-obj/pobj/dwz-0.16/fake-amd64/debug-pkg/Makefile.new to Makefile > Extracting debug info from /exopi-obj/pobj/dwz-0.16/fake-amd64/usr/local/bin/dwz ===> Building package for dwz-0.16 Create /exopi-cvs/ports/packages/amd64/all/dwz-0.16.tgz Creating package dwz-0.16 reading plist| checking dependencies| checksumming| checksumming| | 0% checksumming|****** | 9% checksumming|*********** | 18% checksumming|***************** | 27% checksumming|********************** | 36% checksumming|**************************** | 45% checksumming|********************************* | 55% checksumming|*************************************** | 64% checksumming|******************************************** | 73% checksumming|************************************************** | 82% checksumming|******************************************************* | 91% checksumming|*************************************************************|100% archiving| archiving| | 0% archiving|************************************************************** | 97% archiving|****************************************************************|100% Creating package debug-dwz-0.16 reading plist| checking dependencies| checking dependencies|devel/dwz checksumming| checksumming| | 0% checksumming|***** | 8% checksumming|********** | 17% checksumming|*************** | 25% checksumming|******************** | 33% checksumming|************************* | 42% checksumming|******************************* | 50% checksumming|************************************ | 58% checksumming|***************************************** | 67% checksumming|********************************************** | 75% checksumming|*************************************************** | 83% checksumming|******************************************************** | 92% checksumming|*************************************************************|100% archiving| archiving| | 0% archiving|****************************************************************|100% Link to /exopi-cvs/ports/packages/amd64/ftp/dwz-0.16.tgz Link to /exopi-cvs/ports/packages/amd64/ftp/debug-dwz-0.16.tgz >>> Running clean in devel/dwz at 1764442978.95 ===> devel/dwz ===> Cleaning for dwz-0.16 >>> Ended at 1764442979.39 max_stuck=6.00/build=8.94/package=2.26/clean=0.46