>>> Building on exopi-1 under x11/flvw BDEPENDS = [x11/fltk] DIST = [x11/flvw:flvw-20000224.tgz] FULLPKGNAME = flvw-1.0p4 RDEPENDS = [x11/fltk] (Junk lock obtained for exopi-1 at 1732146399.29) >>> Running depends in x11/flvw at 1732146399.32 last junk was in mail/courier-authlib /usr/sbin/pkg_add -aI -Drepair fltk-1.3.9 was: /usr/sbin/pkg_add -aI -Drepair fltk-1.3.9 /usr/sbin/pkg_add -aI -Drepair fltk-1.3.9 >>> Running show-prepare-results in x11/flvw at 1732146401.90 ===> x11/flvw ===> Building from scratch flvw-1.0p4 ===> flvw-1.0p4 depends on: fltk-* -> fltk-1.3.9 fltk-1.3.9 (Junk lock released for exopi-1 at 1732146402.29) distfiles size=191410 >>> Running build in x11/flvw at 1732146402.31 ===> x11/flvw ===> Checking files for flvw-1.0p4 `/exopi-cvs/ports/distfiles/flvw-20000224.tgz' is up to date. >> (SHA256) all files: OK ===> Extracting for flvw-1.0p4 ===> Patching for flvw-1.0p4 ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-1_0_FL_Flv_Style_H Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- 1.0/FL/Flv_Style.H.orig Sun Jan 30 13:38:46 2000 |+++ 1.0/FL/Flv_Style.H Sat Sep 28 01:33:11 2002 -------------------------- Patching file 1.0/FL/Flv_Style.H using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 79. Hunk #2 succeeded at 109. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-1_0_Makefile Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- 1.0/Makefile.orig Sat Jan 22 14:16:06 2000 |+++ 1.0/Makefile Fri Apr 6 10:34:32 2001 -------------------------- Patching file 1.0/Makefile using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 26. Hunk #2 succeeded at 36. Hunk #3 succeeded at 70 with fuzz 2. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-1_0_configure Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- 1.0/configure.orig Sun Feb 20 15:14:52 2000 |+++ 1.0/configure Sat Aug 10 18:16:17 2002 -------------------------- Patching file 1.0/configure using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 990. Hunk #2 succeeded at 1325. Hunk #3 succeeded at 1339. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-1_0_configure_in Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- 1.0/configure.in.orig Sat Jan 22 14:18:28 2000 |+++ 1.0/configure.in Sat Aug 10 18:16:09 2002 -------------------------- Patching file 1.0/configure.in using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 18. Hunk #2 succeeded at 40. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-1_0_makeinclude_in Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- 1.0/makeinclude.in.orig Sat Jan 22 14:18:28 2000 |+++ 1.0/makeinclude.in Sat Aug 10 18:24:25 2002 -------------------------- Patching file 1.0/makeinclude.in using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 30. Hunk #2 succeeded at 59. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-1_0_src_Flv_List_cxx Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- 1.0/src/Flv_List.cxx.orig Thu Jan 27 13:21:38 2000 |+++ 1.0/src/Flv_List.cxx Mon Feb 25 14:19:36 2002 -------------------------- Patching file 1.0/src/Flv_List.cxx using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 679. Hunk #2 succeeded at 813. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-1_0_src_Flv_Style_cxx Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- 1.0/src/Flv_Style.cxx.orig Sat Jan 22 14:28:44 2000 |+++ 1.0/src/Flv_Style.cxx Sat Feb 10 19:44:38 2001 -------------------------- Patching file 1.0/src/Flv_Style.cxx using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 471. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-1_0_src_Flve_Combo_cxx Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- 1.0/src/Flve_Combo.cxx.orig Thu Jan 27 13:32:00 2000 |+++ 1.0/src/Flve_Combo.cxx Sat Feb 10 19:45:26 2001 -------------------------- Patching file 1.0/src/Flve_Combo.cxx using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 590. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-1_0_test_Makefile Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- 1.0/test/Makefile.orig Sat Jan 22 14:34:26 2000 |+++ 1.0/test/Makefile Sat Aug 10 18:13:00 2002 -------------------------- Patching file 1.0/test/Makefile using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 15. Hunk #2 succeeded at 40. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-1_0_test_testtable2_cxx Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- 1.0/test/testtable2.cxx.orig Sun Jan 23 22:16:00 2000 |+++ 1.0/test/testtable2.cxx Sat Aug 10 19:33:43 2002 -------------------------- Patching file 1.0/test/testtable2.cxx using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 46. done ===> Compiler link: clang -> /usr/bin/clang ===> Compiler link: clang++ -> /usr/bin/clang++ ===> Compiler link: cc -> /usr/bin/cc ===> Compiler link: c++ -> /usr/bin/c++ ===> Generating configure for flvw-1.0p4 ===> Configuring for flvw-1.0p4 Using /exopi-obj/pobj/flvw-1.0/config.site (generated) loading site script /exopi-obj/pobj/flvw-1.0/config.site creating cache ./config.cache checking for gcc... cc checking whether the C compiler (cc -O2 -pipe -L/usr/local/lib) works... yes checking whether the C compiler (cc -O2 -pipe -L/usr/local/lib) is a cross-compiler... no checking whether we are using GNU C... (cached) yes checking whether cc accepts -g... (cached) yes checking for c++... c++ checking whether the C++ compiler (c++ -O2 -pipe -DFLTK_1_0_COMPAT -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib) works... yes checking whether the C++ compiler (c++ -O2 -pipe -DFLTK_1_0_COMPAT -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib) is a cross-compiler... no checking whether we are using GNU C++... yes checking whether c++ accepts -g... (cached) yes checking for ranlib... ranlib checking for ar... /usr/bin/ar checking for rm... (cached) /bin/rm checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E checking for X... (cached) libraries /usr/X11R6/lib, headers /usr/X11R6/include checking for fl_numericsort in -lfltk... yes updating cache ./config.cache creating ./config.status creating makeinclude ===> Building for flvw-1.0p4 === making src === c++ -O2 -pipe -DFLTK_1_0_COMPAT -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I.. -c Flv_Style.cxx c++ -O2 -pipe -DFLTK_1_0_COMPAT -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I.. -c Flv_List.cxx c++ -O2 -pipe -DFLTK_1_0_COMPAT -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I.. -c Flv_Table.cxx c++ -O2 -pipe -DFLTK_1_0_COMPAT -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I.. -c Flv_CStyle.cxx c++ -O2 -pipe -DFLTK_1_0_COMPAT -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I.. -c Flve_Input.cxx c++ -O2 -pipe -DFLTK_1_0_COMPAT -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I.. -c Flve_Check_Button.cxx Building library libflvw.a... /usr/bin/ar: warning: creating ../lib/libflvw.a >>> Running package in x11/flvw at 1732146405.95 ===> x11/flvw ===> Faking installation for flvw-1.0p4 /exopi-obj/pobj/flvw-1.0/bin/install -c -m 644 /exopi-obj/pobj/flvw-1.0/flvw/1.0/lib/libflvw.a /exopi-obj/pobj/flvw-1.0/fake-amd64/usr/local/lib /exopi-obj/pobj/flvw-1.0/bin/install -d -m 755 /exopi-obj/pobj/flvw-1.0/fake-amd64/usr/local/include/FL /exopi-obj/pobj/flvw-1.0/bin/install -c -m 644 /exopi-obj/pobj/flvw-1.0/flvw/1.0/FL/*H /exopi-obj/pobj/flvw-1.0/fake-amd64/usr/local/include/FL ===> Building package for flvw-1.0p4 Create /exopi-cvs/ports/packages/amd64/all/flvw-1.0p4.tgz Creating package flvw-1.0p4 reading plist| checking dependencies| checking dependencies|x11/fltk checksumming| checksumming| | 0% checksumming|**** | 6% checksumming|******* | 12% checksumming|*********** | 18% checksumming|************** | 24% checksumming|****************** | 29% checksumming|********************** | 35% checksumming|************************* | 41% checksumming|***************************** | 47% checksumming|******************************** | 53% checksumming|************************************ | 59% checksumming|*************************************** | 65% checksumming|******************************************* | 71% checksumming|*********************************************** | 76% checksumming|************************************************** | 82% checksumming|****************************************************** | 88% checksumming|********************************************************* | 94% checksumming|*************************************************************|100% archiving| archiving| | 0% archiving|*************************************************** | 80% archiving|**************************************************** | 81% archiving|**************************************************** | 82% archiving|******************************************************** | 88% archiving|************************************************************ | 94% archiving|************************************************************** | 96% archiving|************************************************************** | 97% archiving|****************************************************************| 99% archiving|****************************************************************|100% Link to /exopi-cvs/ports/packages/amd64/ftp/flvw-1.0p4.tgz >>> Running clean in x11/flvw at 1732146406.90 ===> x11/flvw ===> Cleaning for flvw-1.0p4 >>> Ended at 1732146407.14 max_stuck=1.90/depends=2.58/show-prepare-results=0.42/build=3.63/package=0.96/clean=0.26