>>> Building on exopi-4 under devel/dwz DIST = [devel/dwz:dwz-0.16.tar.gz;devel/dwz:xxhash-0.8.3.h] FULLPKGNAME = dwz-0.16p2 distfiles size=456957 >>> Running build in devel/dwz at 1784362220.98 ===> devel/dwz ===> Building from scratch dwz-0.16p2 ===> Verifying specs: c elf ===> found c.103.0 elf.3.0 ===> Checking files for dwz-0.16p2 `/exopi-cvs/ports/distfiles/xxhash-0.8.3.h' is up to date. `/exopi-cvs/ports/distfiles/dwz-0.16.tar.gz' is up to date. >> (SHA256) all files: OK ===> Extracting for dwz-0.16p2 cp /exopi-cvs/ports/distfiles/xxhash-0.8.3.h /exopi-obj/pobj/dwz-0.16/dwz/xxhash.h ===> Patching for dwz-0.16p2 ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-Makefile Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Don't hardcode optimizations, install to the correct locations. |Disable warnings; clang is very chatty. |Put in obstack code. |Convert to bsd make | |Index: Makefile |--- Makefile.orig |+++ Makefile -------------------------- Patching file Makefile using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hunk #2 succeeded at 23. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-args_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Correctly get processors online. | |Index: args.c |--- args.c.orig |+++ args.c -------------------------- Patching file args.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 26. Hunk #2 succeeded at 738. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-dwz_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Create error() function, Linux-ism. |Our libelf doesn't have some of these defines. |obstack is not a system header |xxhash is not a system header |Use libc SHA1 functions. | |Index: dwz.c |--- dwz.c.orig |+++ dwz.c -------------------------- Patching file dwz.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. Hunk #2 succeeded at 39. Hunk #3 succeeded at 213. Hunk #4 succeeded at 13800. Hunk #5 succeeded at 13838. Hunk #6 succeeded at 14335. Hunk #7 succeeded at 14408. Hunk #8 succeeded at 15762. Hunk #9 succeeded at 16027. Hunk #10 succeeded at 16120. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-hashtab_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |More portable endianness check |https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=162#c665 | |ANSIfy. | |Index: hashtab.c |--- hashtab.c.orig |+++ hashtab.c -------------------------- Patching file hashtab.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 38. Hunk #2 succeeded at 66. Hunk #3 succeeded at 129. Hunk #4 succeeded at 137. Hunk #5 succeeded at 148. Hunk #6 succeeded at 176. Hunk #7 succeeded at 193. Hunk #8 succeeded at 216. Hunk #9 succeeded at 252. Hunk #10 succeeded at 298. Hunk #11 succeeded at 334. Hunk #12 succeeded at 348. Hunk #13 succeeded at 414. Hunk #14 succeeded at 425. Hunk #15 succeeded at 445. Hunk #16 succeeded at 464. Hunk #17 succeeded at 483. Hunk #18 succeeded at 491. Hunk #19 succeeded at 500. Hunk #20 succeeded at 510. Hunk #21 succeeded at 542. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-obstack-wrapper_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Fix include invocation | |Index: obstack-wrapper.h |--- obstack-wrapper.h.orig |+++ obstack-wrapper.h -------------------------- Patching file obstack-wrapper.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 21. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-obstack_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |From https://github.com/void-linux/musl-obstack | |Index: obstack.c |--- obstack.c.orig |+++ obstack.c -------------------------- (Creating file obstack.c...) Patching file obstack.c using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-obstack_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |From https://github.com/void-linux/musl-obstack | |Index: obstack.h |--- obstack.h.orig |+++ obstack.h -------------------------- (Creating file obstack.h...) Patching file obstack.h using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-sha1_c Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |More portable endianness check |https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=162#c665 | |Index: sha1.c |--- sha1.c.orig |+++ sha1.c -------------------------- Patching file sha1.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 29. done ===> Applying OpenBSD patch patch-xxhash_h Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: xxhash.h |--- xxhash.h.orig |+++ xxhash.h -------------------------- Patching file xxhash.h using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 2297. done ===> Compiler link: clang -> /usr/bin/clang ===> Compiler link: clang++ -> /usr/bin/clang++ ===> Compiler link: cc -> /usr/bin/cc ===> Compiler link: c++ -> /usr/bin/c++ ===> Generating configure for dwz-0.16p2 ===> Configuring for dwz-0.16p2 ===> Building for dwz-0.16p2 cc -O2 -pipe -g -DNATIVE_POINTER_SIZE=8 -DNATIVE_ENDIAN_VAL=ELFDATA2LSB -DDWZ_VERSION='"0.16"' -DFSF_YEARS='"1992-2021"' -DRH_YEARS='"2001-2021"' -DSUSE_YEARS='"2019-2021"' -DMJW_YEARS='"2024-2025"' -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DXXH_INLINE_ALL=1 -c args.c cc -O2 -pipe -g -DNATIVE_POINTER_SIZE=8 -DNATIVE_ENDIAN_VAL=ELFDATA2LSB -DDWZ_VERSION='"0.16"' -DFSF_YEARS='"1992-2021"' -DRH_YEARS='"2001-2021"' -DSUSE_YEARS='"2019-2021"' -DMJW_YEARS='"2024-2025"' -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DXXH_INLINE_ALL=1 -c dwz.c cc -O2 -pipe -g -DNATIVE_POINTER_SIZE=8 -DNATIVE_ENDIAN_VAL=ELFDATA2LSB -DDWZ_VERSION='"0.16"' -DFSF_YEARS='"1992-2021"' -DRH_YEARS='"2001-2021"' -DSUSE_YEARS='"2019-2021"' -DMJW_YEARS='"2024-2025"' -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DXXH_INLINE_ALL=1 -c hashtab.c cc -O2 -pipe -g -DNATIVE_POINTER_SIZE=8 -DNATIVE_ENDIAN_VAL=ELFDATA2LSB -DDWZ_VERSION='"0.16"' -DFSF_YEARS='"1992-2021"' -DRH_YEARS='"2001-2021"' -DSUSE_YEARS='"2019-2021"' -DMJW_YEARS='"2024-2025"' -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DXXH_INLINE_ALL=1 -c pool.c cc -O2 -pipe -g -DNATIVE_POINTER_SIZE=8 -DNATIVE_ENDIAN_VAL=ELFDATA2LSB -DDWZ_VERSION='"0.16"' -DFSF_YEARS='"1992-2021"' -DRH_YEARS='"2001-2021"' -DSUSE_YEARS='"2019-2021"' -DMJW_YEARS='"2024-2025"' -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DXXH_INLINE_ALL=1 -c dwarfnames.c cc -O2 -pipe -g -DNATIVE_POINTER_SIZE=8 -DNATIVE_ENDIAN_VAL=ELFDATA2LSB -DDWZ_VERSION='"0.16"' -DFSF_YEARS='"1992-2021"' -DRH_YEARS='"2001-2021"' -DSUSE_YEARS='"2019-2021"' -DMJW_YEARS='"2024-2025"' -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DXXH_INLINE_ALL=1 -c obstack.c cc -o dwz args.o dwz.o hashtab.o pool.o dwarfnames.o obstack.o -lelf ld: warning: dwz.c:13855(dwz.o:(fdopen_dso)): warning: strcpy() is almost always misused, please use strlcpy() ld: warning: dwz.c:731(dwz.o:(read_debug_info)): warning: sprintf() is often misused, please use snprintf() >>> Running package in devel/dwz at 1784362227.60 ===> devel/dwz ===> Faking installation for dwz-0.16p2 install -D dwz /exopi-obj/pobj/dwz-0.16/fake-amd64/usr/local/bin/dwz install -D -m 644 ./dwz.1 /exopi-obj/pobj/dwz-0.16/fake-amd64/usr/local/man/man1/dwz.1 Reading existing plist for dwz-0.16p2 Writing /exopi-obj/pobj/dwz-0.16/fake-amd64/debug-pkg/Makefile.new Writing /exopi-obj/pobj/dwz-0.16/fake-amd64/debug-pkg/PLIST Renaming /exopi-obj/pobj/dwz-0.16/fake-amd64/debug-pkg/Makefile.new to Makefile > Extracting debug info from /exopi-obj/pobj/dwz-0.16/fake-amd64/usr/local/bin/dwz ===> Building package for dwz-0.16p2 Create /exopi-cvs/ports/packages/amd64/all/dwz-0.16p2.tgz Creating package dwz-0.16p2 reading plist| checking dependencies| checksumming| checksumming| | 0% checksumming|****** | 9% checksumming|*********** | 18% checksumming|***************** | 27% checksumming|********************** | 36% checksumming|**************************** | 45% checksumming|********************************* | 55% checksumming|*************************************** | 64% checksumming|******************************************** | 73% checksumming|************************************************** | 82% checksumming|******************************************************* | 91% checksumming|*************************************************************|100% archiving| archiving| | 0% archiving|************************************************************** | 97% archiving|****************************************************************|100% Creating package debug-dwz-0.16p2 reading plist| checking dependencies| checking dependencies|devel/dwz checksumming| checksumming| | 0% checksumming|***** | 8% checksumming|********** | 17% checksumming|*************** | 25% checksumming|******************** | 33% checksumming|************************* | 42% checksumming|******************************* | 50% checksumming|************************************ | 58% checksumming|***************************************** | 67% checksumming|********************************************** | 75% checksumming|*************************************************** | 83% checksumming|******************************************************** | 92% checksumming|*************************************************************|100% archiving| archiving| | 0% archiving|****************************************************************|100% Link to /exopi-cvs/ports/packages/amd64/ftp/dwz-0.16p2.tgz Link to /exopi-cvs/ports/packages/amd64/ftp/debug-dwz-0.16p2.tgz >>> Running clean in devel/dwz at 1784362229.26 ===> devel/dwz ===> Cleaning for dwz-0.16p2 >>> Ended at 1784362229.44 max_stuck=4.54/build=6.62/package=1.66/clean=0.21